Soccer prediction Neville on Chelsea: What`s the use of 8-year contracts? If Mudryk turns into Messi in 4 years, he will demand to pay him more

Blog of Soccer Win Bet

Gary Neville sees no point in Chelsea`s decision to sign long-term contracts.


The eight-year contract does not provide any certainty. Let`s say Mudryk turns into Lionel Messi in four years, and Chelsea will say: He`s signed for another 4 years on a low salary.


But what difference does it make if both Mudrik himself and his agent demand to pay more? And either you raise his salary to Messi levels, or you have a disgruntled player for four years who will feel that he is being exploited because he signed an eight-year contract at 22.


I don`t understand how in this country, especially for a visiting player, you can stick to an eight-year contract when the player has made significant progress.


Will all the coaches who will work with the team over these 8 years need this player? Will the player want to return home at some point?


It seems to me that in football, unlike the NFL, there is little benefit to an 8 year contract. If a five-year contract is signed and the player is doing well after three years, then you still have two years left. Eight? I just do not understand.


"I don`t see any benefit other than accounting related to the accounting mechanism and financial fair play requirements, " the former Manchester United defender said in his podcast.



Neville on Chelsea: What`s the use of 8-year contracts? If Mudryk turns into Messi in 4 years, he will demand to pay him more Soccer prediction - more details and information: Soccer prediction

Blog of Soccer Win Bet